Camilla interior application reference from the original product catalogue

Reading HUAGE plank records: dimensions, top layers and finishes in the 1900 series

Five 1900 planks have comparable construction and dimension fields with individual finish differences. This article reads overall dimensions, solid wood top layer, appearance groups and finishes separately, explaining why a shared specification group still needs design-specific samples and supply approval.

HUAGE Editorial Team · Official information

Topic

Products and materials

Section

Official information

Document scope

HUAGE product and project materials

Original product catalogue materials · Camilla; for observing interior and grain relationships. Specific construction and specifications follow the cited sources and project confirmations in this article.

Champs-Élysées, Rebecca, Camilla, Chloe and Zoe form one comparable straight-board group in the original product catalogue. All five list European white oak top layers, Russian all-birch plywood cores, 1900 × 190 × 16 mm boards and 4.0 mm solid wood top layers. Shared dimensions support appearance comparisons but do not mean identical finishing processes.

First separate the four dimensional fields

1900 and 190 describe length and width; 16 is the board's overall thickness, while 4.0 is the solid wood top-layer thickness. The first three dimensions affect layout and coordination of the finished floor level; the top layer is listed separately to explain the construction. Procurement records should use ‘length × width × overall thickness; top layer’ so that four consecutive numbers are not misread. The top-layer measurement must not be mistaken for another overall-thickness option.

Original dimensions are display parameters for that document version. Confirm current availability, connections, quantities and delivery for the project. If the design has reserved a finished level, the installation proposal must explain layers beyond the supplied board thickness. A 16 mm board is not automatically the total installed height.

Compare different textures within the same board format

The original pages list hand-scraped or blunt-tool finishes for Champs-Élysées and Rebecca, cross-sanding for Camilla, and brushing for Chloe and Zoe. Retain each finish with its corresponding name rather than applying one to the entire group. Compare surface relief under oblique light and tone from the front, establishing whether the design needs a smooth feel, pronounced texture or a balance.

The original appearance group for the five designs states ABCD and notes knots. This is appearance information, not an environmental grade or universal quality ranking. To limit prominent knots, colour variation or grain changes, specify acceptance within the sample range rather than changing one letter alone. A combined record of several samples is closer to later board-sorting discussions than a single photograph.

Move from document comparison to order approval

Arrange the five designs in a comparison schedule, placing shared dimensions and construction together while distinguishing each finish and sample number. Recheck colour, sheen and grain under real lighting before assigning designs to locations. If adjoining rooms use different designs, also check connections and levels; shared dimensions do not remove transition details.

Catalogue names remain retrieval references; supply documents must state the final configuration and application. Overseas briefs also need destination, transport and local installation conditions. These specifications support clear comparisons but do not establish UK stock, universal lead times or suitability in every environment.